Lexington Insurance Company argued that a cargo-damage claim related back to its original action for breach of the settlement agreement. The court of appeals held that the relation-back doctrine applies to a Carmack Amendment claim. The cargo-damage claim and the breach-of-settlement claim both arose out of the same occurrence. The federal district court's holding that Lexington's breach-of-settlement claim is not preempted by the Carmack Amendment does not compel the conclusion that it is based on a wholly different transaction than the cargo-damage claim. The court of appeals' judgment is reversed and remanded. Texas Supreme Court, No. 11-0597, 01-25-2013.
Lexington Insurance Co. v. Daybreak Express Inc.
Tx. Sup. Ct.
January 30, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.