In this Fair Credit Reporting Act case, the appellant, a consumer finance company, contends that the appellee did not offer legally sufficient evidence of his various claimed items of damage. Cousin v. Trans Union Corp., 246 F.3d 359 (5th Cir. 2001) is not controlling here, because in the absence of a special verdict, the amount of any recovery for the appellee's non-economic damages, and therefore its sustainability, is purely speculative. The district court's judgment is affirmed. 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 12-50007, 12-20-2012.
Smith v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.
December 26, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.