The appellant suggests that because he uttered "guilty" as opposed to "true" to the allegations in the state's motion to revoke, the state was obligated to tender evidence showing he violated the conditions of his probation. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 1.15 did not require more of the state before probation could be revoked. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Amarillo Court of Appeals, No. 07-12-0352-CR, 12-14-2012.
Font Size:
![]()
Hughes v. State
Tex. App. Dist. 7
December 19, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
