Font Size: increase font decrease font

Hughes v. State

Tex. App. Dist. 7

December 19, 2012

The appellant suggests that because he uttered "guilty" as opposed to "true" to the allegations in the state's motion to revoke, the state was obligated to tender evidence showing he violated the conditions of his probation. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 1.15 did not require more of the state before probation could be revoked. The trial court's judgment is affirmed. Amarillo Court of Appeals, No. 07-12-0352-CR, 12-14-2012.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
Find similar content
  1. Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  2. D.C. Circuit to Hear Complaint Against Judge Edith Jones
  3. Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  4. DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  5. Governor Perry Cuts Millions from Public Integrity Unit