In this suit alleging a permanent nuisance, the court of appeals affirmed the trial court's judgment for the plaintiffs, several homeowners. Because property owner testimony is the functional equivalent of expert testimony, it must be judged by the same standards. While a nuisance can diminish values, the conclusory and speculative testimony here does not support such a finding. The court of appeals' judgment is reversed and remanded. Texas Supreme Court, No. 10-0451, 12-14-2012.
Font Size:
![]()
Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. Justiss
Tx. Sup. Ct.
December 18, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
