Haas v. Otto

The appellant challenges the trial court's order by which the trial court granted a plea to the jurisdiction and dismissed her partition claim concerning 164.26 acres she asserts was not divided when the trial court entered an agreed decree of divorce. The pleadings affirmatively demonstrate that the divorce court did not divide the ownership of the 164.26 acres and that the parties are tenants in common. The trial court's judgment is reversed and remanded. Eastland Court of Appeals, No. 11-11-00234-CV, 12-13-2012.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.