Font Size: increase font decrease font

In Re: Birdwell

Tex. App. Dist. 10

December 11, 2012

This is the petitioner's 10th petition for writ of mandamus. He alleges that testimony about DNA testing at his trial was sealed. There is no sealed testimony in the appellate record. While Chapter 64 may authorize successive motions, there comes a point at which a trial court does not abuse its discretion by simply refusing to rule on every motion a litigant may file. The petition is denied. Waco Court of Appeals, No. 10-12-00283-CR, 12-06-2012.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
Find similar content
  1. Former State Bar of Texas Employee Pleads Guilty to Theft
  2. Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  3. Bankruptcy Booms, Energy Expands for Texas Law Firms
  4. Litigator of the Week: Dog Bites Man
  5. Judges Spar, But Fake Lawyer's Conviction Stands