The appellant challenges a jury verdict finding him guilty of allegedly driving while intoxicated. No reasonable view of the record supports the trial court's conclusion that the intoxilyzer had been properly maintained and was properly operating when appellant gave a breath sample. The trial court's judgment is reversed and remanded. Fort Worth Court of Appeals, No. 02-11-00410-CR, 11-21-2012.
Rhyne v. State
Tex. App. Dist. 2
November 27, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.