The appellant was convicted by a jury of the alleged manufacture of methamphetamine in an amount of more than one gram but less than four grams. The defendant's statement that he "could" produce a certain amount of the illicit drug from a determined quantity of raw materials does not suffice to prove that the quantity of methamphetamine actually produced exceeded one ounce. The trial court's judgment is reversed and remanded. Texarkana Court of Appeals, No. 06-11-00227-CR, 11-27-2012.
Font Size: 
Canida v. State
Tex. App. Dist. 6
November 30, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Texas Lawyer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
