<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Law.com - National Law Journal</title> 
<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/index.jsp</link> 
<description>Selected Op-Ed articles from the NLJ</description> 
<language>en-us</language> 
<copyright>Copyright 2013. ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<docs>http://www.law.com/jsp/law/terms.jsp</docs> 
<atom:link href="http://www.law.com/jsp/rss/rss_nlj_npr.jsp" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
						<title>OPINION: Time for Radical Change in  Legal Education</title>					
					<description>Students would save three years of tuition if they could enter law school after their freshman year.</description>								
					<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202600580055&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202600580055</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>OPINION: Prosecutors Help with Exonerations</title>					
					<description>Law enforcement personnel initiated or cooperated in a record high number of them in 2012.</description>								
					<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202600580133&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202600580133</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>The Justices Confront a Solomonic Task</title>					
					<description>Currently the U.S. Supreme Court is considering a case that pits the interests of a white, would-be adoptive couple, to whom a Latina biological mother surrendered her baby girl at birth, against those of the natural father and his Cherokee tribe.</description>								
					<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:59:40 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202600434011&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202600434011</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>Letter to the Editor: Reading Too Much into Minor Case</title>					
					<description>Dan Schweitzer, Supreme Court counsel of the National Association of Attorneys General, responds to Simon Lazarus' NLJ piece about the implications of Wos v. E.M.A.</description>								
					<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:17:06 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202600228745&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202600228745</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>OPINION: 'Miranda' and the Constitution</title>					
					<description>It has become increasingly evident that the Justice Department violated the constitutional rights of Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev by questioning him without his Miranda warnings. It is disturbing that the DOJ would risk its criminal prosecution by ignoring such basic rules and even more disturbing for what this says as to its view of the Constitution.</description>								
					<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202599627572&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202599627572</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>OPINION: Failure to Mirandize Does Not Violate Constitution  or 'Miranda'</title>					
					<description>Much of the discussion in the media on whether the surviving Boston bombing suspect should have been given Miranda warnings when he was arrested appears to be based on a misconception: that law enforcement officers are required to give suspects the warnings set forth in Miranda v. Arizona and that failure to do so is a violation of the law, at least if the public-safety exception doesn't apply. That is not correct.</description>								
					<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202599602300&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202599602300</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>High Court Defends Consumer Rights and Economic Freedom</title>					
					<description>Given any ambiguity, as Justice Anthony Kennedy has aptly proclaimed in his book, "the tie goes to freedom." That is what the court did in  Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons.</description>								
					<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:11:20 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202599531477&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202599531477</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>ABA and Legal Education: Change Won't Come from Within</title>					
					<description>Since legal education provides access to justice, power and social mobility, urgent reform is needed now.</description>								
					<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 12:12:56 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202599229647&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202599229647</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>Businesses Should Have The Right to Make Their Case</title>					
					<description>Courts should be impartial forums, where everyone can at least get a fair opportunity to voice their arguments. Sadly, in cases involving businesses, courts regularly put a thumb on the scales of justice.</description>								
					<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:42:06 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202598342270&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202598342270</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>The First Amendment and the 'Reparative' Therapy Cases</title>					
					<description>Tempers will surely continue to run hot over the merits of "reparative" therapy, and rightly so. But it is important not to let hard cases (or unsympathetic plaintiffs) make bad law.</description>								
					<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:52:32 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202598182462&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202598182462</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>OPINION: When Soldiers Go Social On Politics</title>					
					<description>Although the Uniform Code of Military Justice criminalizes a servicemember's use of 'contemptuous words' against the president, some use social media to insult Obama.</description>								
					<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202597683351&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202597683351</guid>
						</item>
				<item>
						<title>OPINION: One Prescription for Medical Device and Drug Law</title>					
					<description>Any Supreme Court decision in this case will not unify the law. Congress needs to step in and create a unified medical device and brand/generic drug system that does not draw arbitrary distinctions.</description>								
					<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate>								
					<link>http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1202597683114&amp;rss=rss_nlj</link>
						<guid isPermaLink="false">1202597683114</guid>
						</item>
				</channel> 
</rss>
