Franchise Law
Defaults in Franchise Relationship That Constitute Irreparable Harm
The Legal Intelligencer
Friday, May 24, 2013
Franchise fees are said to be the lifeblood of the franchise system. If the royalties are not paid, does it constitute a claim for money damages or does it create grounds for injunctive relief?
Sponsor Spotlight
Most Viewed Articles
- Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out
- Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook
- Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
- Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive
- Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
Practice Areas
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Antitrust Law
- Appellate Law
- Bankruptcy Law
- Business of Law
- Diversity
- Eastern District Practice
- Employment Law
- Environmental Law
- Ethics
- Family Law
- Financial Advice
- Franchise Law
- From The Chief
- Health Care Law
- In-House Counsel
- Intellectual Property
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Marketing
- Litigation
- Paralegals
- Personal Injury
- Professional Development
- Public Interest
- Real Estate
- Securities Law/Litigation
- Technology Law
- Trusts & Estates
- White Collar
- Workers' Compensation
Sponsor Spotlight
Franchise Law
Detrimental Impact of Proposed Discovery Limits on Employees
The Legal Intelligencer
Friday, May 24, 2013
Fewer depositions, reduced number of interrogatories, less requests for admissions and a proportionality requirement in discovery. This could be the new face of discovery under proposed rule changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Franchise Law
Does a Graduate Law Degree Increase a Lawyer's Value?
The Legal Intelligencer
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Today, LL.M. degrees, a.k.a. Masters of Law, or, for the fancy, the Latin name Legum Magister, are offered in a variety of legal specialties ranging from trial advocacy to intellectual property to international law to taxation.
Franchise Law
Understanding Pa.'s Wage Payment and Collection Law
The Legal Intelligencer
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Recently, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in O'Donnell v. Passport Health Communications, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51432 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 10, 2013), provided a not-so-gentle reminder to employers of the potential pitfalls of Pennsylvania's Wage Payment and Collection Law (WPCL).
Franchise Law
Ways to Craft a Construction Contract to Protect Owner
The Legal Intelligencer
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
While there is no way to eliminate all of an owner's risks on a construction project, the most important, and often most overlooked, tool to minimize those risks is the construction contract.
Franchise Law
Leave-of-Absence Issues Managers Need to Know
The Legal Intelligencer
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
In many organizations, the human resources function is handled by specialists who guide managers' decision-making to ensure consistency with myriad employment laws.
Franchise Law
Third Circuit Scrutinizes Cy Pres Distributions
The Legal Intelligencer
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
A settlement is a settlement. The parties agree on its terms, terminate the litigation, and move on. Right? Not always. Class actions, for example, are different.
Franchise Law
Parents and Children Suffer Without Parenting Coordinators
The Legal Intelligencer
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
I read with interest the article titled, "Concerns Over Judicial Authority Drove Parenting Coordination Elimination," published in the May 7 edition of Pennsylvania Law Weekly.
Franchise Law
Regulating Fracking: Zoning and States' Interests
The Legal Intelligencer
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
In the August 28, 2012, column in this series, "Natural Gas and Zoning: The Commonwealth Court's Act 13 Decision," David G. Mandelbaum discussed Robinson Township v. Public Utilities Commission, holding Act 13's zoning pre-emption to be unconstitutional. He ended by posing the broader question of whether states or municipalities ought to regulate natural gas development.
Franchise Law
Regulating Political Intelligence Is Less Than Intelligent
The Legal Intelligencer
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Last year, Congress passed an important law clarifying that members of Congress, their staff and all federal employees must abide by the same insider trading prohibitions as everyone else.
