The court granted in part defendant attorneys' request for a protective order because exceptions to attorney-client work product doctrine did not apply here and defendants' former clients could not unilaterally waive the communications privilege with respect to a co-client. Affirmance recommended.
22 Front Street, LLC v. Gorodetzer, PICS Case No. 13-0921 (C.P. Philadelphia March 6, 2013) Glazer, J. (24 pages).
The Legal Intelligencer
May 21, 2013