• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Executives Sentenced to Five Years in Prison Over Kabul Bank Collapse

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Executives Sentenced to Five Years in Prison Over Kabul Bank Collapse

Sentences raise questions about Afghan government's commitment to rooting out corruption

By Heidi Vogt and Rahim Faiez All Articles 

The Associated Press

March 7, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

An Afghan tribunal sentenced two top executives to five years in prison Tuesday for misappropriating hundreds of millions of dollars from the nation's largest bank in a scandal that caused it to fail and threatened the country's fragile economy.

Observers called the sentences remarkably light given the crime, raising questions once again about the Afghan government's commitment to rooting out corruption. The Kabul Bank's collapse and subsequent bailout represented more than 5 percent of Afghanistan's gross domestic product, making it one of the largest banking failures in the world in relative terms.

The scandal has become a test case for President Hamid Karzai's pledge to clean up the notoriously corrupt government. Karzai has been regularly accused of prosecuting low-level graft while ignoring massive thievery on the part of friends or powerful allies. A report in November by the Independent Joint Anti-Corruption Monitoring and Evaluation Committee said political interference has stymied much of the Kabul Bank investigation.

The Afghan government is almost entirely funded by foreign donors, many of whom have threatened to pull or curtail financing if they do not see proof that Karzai's administration is ensuring that the money reaches Afghan citizens as intended.

Judge Shams-ul-Rahman Shams said the bank's former chairman Sherkhan Farnood and former chief executive officer Khalilullah Ferozi were guilty of misappropriating $278 million and $530 million, respectively. Farnood and Ferozi were also ordered to pay back these funds.

At the hearing, Farnood said he became the scapegoat for the real culprits at the bank. Ferozi spoke more gently, saying he did not accuse anyone but felt there needed to be a fuller accounting of the money. He swore to pay back any funds he was shown to have stolen.

The two were among 21 Kabul Bank and government employees found guilty of wrongdoing on Tuesday -- the first convictions from a debacle that erupted in 2010 and saw $861 million in fraudulent loans disappear into the pockets of friends and relatives of the powerful men behind the bank.

November's report said Kabul Bank was run like a Ponzi scheme with deposits used to fund lavish villas in Dubai and other luxury purchases. Hundreds of millions of dollars were sent out of Afghanistan -- some in airplane food trays, according to the report.

The chairman of the independent monitoring group, Drago Kos, called Tuesday's ruling "a disappointment."

"International standards require sanctions that are proportionate, dissuasive, and effective. We feel that this is lacking in the judgment issued today," Kos said in a statement.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Associated Press
  • Independent Joint Anti-Corruption Monitoring and Evaluation Committee
  • Kabul Company Bank

Key categories

    
  • White Collar Crime

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out
    •      
  2. Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook
    •      
  3. Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive
    •      
  4. Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
    •      
  5. Leave-of-Absence Issues Managers Need to Know
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media