• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > First Circuit: Museum Antiquities Can't Be Used to Satisfy Judgment Against Iran

Font Size: increase font decrease font

First Circuit: Museum Antiquities Can't Be Used to Satisfy Judgment Against Iran

By Sheri Qualters All Articles 

The National Law Journal

March 5, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A federal appeals court has ruled that plaintiffs injured in a 1997 Hamas terrorist attack in Jerusalem can't attach Iranian antiquities at Boston-area museums to fulfill a judgment award against the Republic of Iran.

On February 27, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a ruling by George O'Toole Jr. of the District of Massachusetts dissolving attachments of the property.

Jenny Rubin and other plaintiffs sought to attach Iranian antiquities from Boston's Museum of Fine Arts and several Harvard University museums.

The First Circuit held that the antiquities are not "blocked assets" -- assets seized or frozen by the United States as part of a trade sanction, under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002. The court also held that because Iran never claimed to own the museum pieces, they couldn't be "contested" and ultimately attached under Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control regulations.

The case stemmed from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which found "clear and convincing evidence" in a 2003 ruling that Iran and other defendants gave terrorist training and other assistance to the Hamas terrorists behind the bombing.

Iran has not honored that judgment, so the judgment creditors filed a motion for attachment by trustee process in federal court in Massachusetts.

In September 2011, O'Toole held that the plaintiffs did not prove that any item at the museums was property of the Islamic Republic of Iran. He also held that Iranian law does not "vest ownership of the antiquities at issue with the government of Iran."

Senio r Judge Norman Stahl wrote the opinion in Rubin v. Harvard University, joined by Judge Jeffrey Howard and Senior Judge Kermit Lipez.

Stahl wrote that the First Circuit deferred to the Office of Foreign Assets Control's "reasonable position" that an asset can be contested "only if Iran itself has claimed an interest in the asset."

"Iran has never made such a claim with regard to the antiquities in the Museums' possession," Stahl wrote.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Covington & Burling
  • Looney & Grossman
  • Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • First Circuit
  • Terrorism Risk Insurance
  • Treasury Office of Foreign Assets Control
  • Museum of Fine Arts
  • Hamas
  • US District Court
  • Harvard University
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Workplace Bullying: Managing the Organizational Playground
    •      
  2. New District Judge Takes Firm Line on Attorney Conduct
    •      
  3. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  4. Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment
    •      
  5. Judges Want Master to Develop Record in Retirement Age Case
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge Declines to Block Act-of-War Defense in 9/11 Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Panel Finds 'Excessive' City Fine for Poaching Antenna From Trash
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive

Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media