• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Federal Judge Lets Obama's China Wind Farm Ban Stand

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Federal Judge Lets Obama's China Wind Farm Ban Stand

However, Ralls Corp. has right to a hearing over whether the White House should be forced to explain its decision, judge rules

By Jesse J. Holland All Articles 

The Associated Press

February 27, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

A U.S. judge said Friday she can't overturn President Barack Obama's decision to revoke a Chinese company's purchase of four wind farm projects in the vicinity of a U.S. naval facility's restricted airspace.

However, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson said the Ralls Corp. has a right to a hearing over whether the White House should be forced to explain its decision.

In his September decision, Obama ordered Ralls Corp., a company owned by Chinese nationals, to divest its interest in the wind farms it purchased earlier this year in the U.S. state of Oregon. The wind farm sites are all in the vicinity of restricted air space near the Naval Weapons Systems Training Facility Boardman. The administration cites unspecified national security risks as the reason for blocking the transaction.

Ralls sued. Its CEO, Wu Jialiang, said in Beijing in October that his company would "never do anything that threatens U.S. national security."

Jackson said the federal courts don't have the power to get involved in the president's decision-making on this issue.

The law "is not the least bit ambiguous about the role of the courts: 'The actions of the president … and the findings of the president … shall not be subject to judicial review,'" she said.

However, Jackson said the courts can hold hearings on whether the government deprived Ralls of its property without due process of law. Ralls argued that the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution's Fifth Amendment entitles it to an opportunity to be heard and to hear the reasons for Obama's decision, she said.

"It is true that the finality provision will bar the court from hearing any attack on the president's findings," Jackson said. "But there is a difference between asking a court to decide whether one was entitled to know what the president's reasons were and asking a court to assess the sufficiency of those reasons."

Jackson said she will hear arguments on that issue later.

Copyright 2013 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Ralls
  • Naval Weapons Systems Training Facility Boardman
  • Associated Press

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Sources: Justice McCaffery Contacted FJD About Cases
    •      
  2. Bellwether Porn Trial Ends; Producer Wins Damages
    •      
  3. Senate Confirms Two Fed. Judges for Eastern District
    •      
  4. Corbett to Nominate Stevens to High Court
    •      
  5. Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Corporate Cyberattacks Come Out of the Shadows

Minority-Owned Firm Makes Microsoft's Premier List

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Sets Down Procedure for Discovery in Child Porn Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fixes Urged for Jury Questions in Complex Medical Malpractice Suits

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

NYLJ 100

Circuit Orders Return of Child to Singapore
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement

Senate Mulling Bill Aimed at Redefining Child Abuse

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

DA Rosemary Lehmberg Faces Second Removal Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Gideon's Army' Rallies Its Troops For Justice

Kia Case To Put New Open Records Act To Test
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media