• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > New Law School Research Center to Focus on Reproductive Rights

Font Size: increase font decrease font

New Law School Research Center to Focus on Reproductive Rights

By Karen Sloan All Articles 

The National Law Journal

January 25, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The University of California, Berkeley School of Law has launched a Center on Reproductive Rights and Justice to conduct research into the ways laws controlling reproduction affect women and larger communities.

"We're examining the courts, legislation, and regulations, as well as how the laws play out in everyday lives," executive director Jill Adams said in a written statement. "What is needed for all members of society to obtain access to resources necessary to determine their own destinies related to reproduction?"

Despite the huge political controversy over reproductive freedom and abortion rights, law schools haven't much emphasized the underlying legal issues. A 2010 survey by Law Students for Reproductive Justice found that only one-fifth of American Bar Association-accredited law schools had offered a reproductive rights class during the previous eight years.

The Center for Reproductive Rights, based in New York, collaborates with law schools to stage events and promote teaching and research about reproductive rights, but few law schools have formal research centers dedicated to the topic.

Berkeley's announcement was timed to coincide with the 40th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Roe v. Wade. Professor Kristin Luker, the initiative's founder, noted that lawmakers have chipped away at abortion rights ever since Roe.

"Because of these restrictions and other financial and societal barriers to access, the formal legal right is often not enough for poor, young, and rural women to get the abortion care they need," Luker said.

The center already is backing a bill that would increase the number of health care providers in California who can perform abortions, and is also seeking to change state welfare rules. Specifically, it has joined with the East Bay Community Law Center and other reproductive rights groups to try to repeal the Maximum Family Grant rule, which bars families under some circumstances from receiving additional aid following the birth of a child.

Organizers see a connection between reproductive rights and welfare regulations.

"Part of our work is to impress upon people that these aren't fringe issues experienced in a vacuum, but widespread experiences that are integral to individual well-being and to the realization of economic justice, racial justice, LGBTQ rights and more," Adams said.

In addition to policy matters, the center's leaders aim to produce the first U.S. reproductive rights law textbook within two years. They plan to co-host a symposium in October with the Center for Reproductive Rights.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Maximum Family Grant
  • Center for Reproductive Rights
  • Berkeley, California School
  • American Bar Association
  • University of California
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Key categories

    
  • Law Schools

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook
    •      
  2. Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out
    •      
  3. Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill
    •      
  4. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  5. Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

EEOC Gets Tough With Companies on Genetic Privacy

Retailers Facing Employment Law Vulnerabilities

Amid Spy Scandal, Russia Boots Baker & McKenzie Lawyer

Survey: Firm Leaders Admit Downturn's Permanent Impact

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Loaner Judges Helping Essex Cope With Persistent Vacancies
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Surrogate Faces Suspension for Political Activity, Drunken Driving
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court System, Counties Agree on 3 Court Facility Upgrades

Guardian Who Delayed Final Account Must Pay Referee Fee
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out

McVay Wins Superior Court Nod With Western Turnout
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Insurer Beats Bid By Bilked Client
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Barnes Asks For Court-Appointed Lawyer To Help Defend Brooks

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media