• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From Somali Pirates

Font Size: increase font decrease font

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Appeal From Somali Pirates

The Associated Press

January 24, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday turned down an appeal from Somali men who were the first people convicted on federal piracy charges in nearly 200 years.

The justices did not comment in refusing to go into the convictions and sentences of life in prison.

The five defendants were prosecuted in Norfolk, Va., the first in a series of government prosecutions aimed at slowing the spread of piracy off Africa. It was the first piracy conviction in a U.S. courtroom since 1819.

The attacks came as pirates increased assaults in the waters off East Africa despite an international flotilla of warships dedicated to protecting vessels and stopping the pirate assaults.

The Nicholas, which was part of the flotilla, was mistaken for a merchant ship because the Navy used a lighting array to disguise the 453-foot warship and attract pirates. Three pirates in a skiff fired rocket-propelled grenades and raked the ship with AK-47 fire in the Indian Ocean north of the Seychelles Islands. No sailors were injured in the attack.

Defense lawyers had argued the men were innocent fishermen who had been abducted by pirates and forced to fire their weapons at the Virginia-based USS Nicholas.

But the government said that the Somalis had confessed to attacking the U.S. Navy ship after mistaking it for a merchant ship.

The court also rejected a separate appeal from another group of Somalis who have yet to be tried on piracy charges.

In that case, a lower court judge had dismissed charges against five Somalis in an attack on the USS Ashland, ruling since the men had not taken control or robbed the ship, their actions did not rise to the definition of piracy.

But a federal appeals court ruled last year that an armed attack on a U.S. vessel constituted piracy. That ruling sent the case back to U.S. District Court for trial.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Associated Press
  • US District Court
  • U.S. Navy
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Sources: Justice McCaffery Contacted FJD About Cases
    •      
  2. Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement
    •      
  3. Senate Confirms Two Fed. Judges for Eastern District
    •      
  4. Corbett to Nominate Stevens to High Court
    •      
  5. O'Connor Suggests End to Judicial Elections in Pa.
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

SEC Issues Whistleblower Award; More on the Horizon

Fixing Outside Counsel Budget Forecasting With Data

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

iPad Competition Heats Up

Discovery on Discovery Demands Cost-Shifting

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

3rd Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Texas DA Faces Removal Suits Over DWI, Alleged Misconduct
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Upholds Disqualification of Bickel & Brewer
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media