• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Defense Counsel Raise Questions About Indicting Grand Juries

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Criminal Practice

Previous

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Next

Defense Counsel Raise Questions About Indicting Grand Juries

December 26, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Pagano argued in court papers that the supervising judge incorrectly told O'Neill that being put under oath required her to "'testify completely, truthfully and accurately,'" that she could not speak to a lawyer about her testimony without permission of the court, and that "'only you know if these questions will expose you to criminal liability.'"

Pagano added in court papers that it "is the purpose of counsel" to advise clients of the potential for exposure to criminal liability, "especially in a case" where the law is unclear.

"Grand juries really need to be supervised properly; otherwise it becomes a hotbed for potential abuse," Pagano said.

Another problem in O'Neill's case, Pagano said, was that she was subpoenaed just the day before she was supposed to appear before the grand jury, prohibiting an opportunity to consult an attorney, and she did not receive the advice-of-rights form.

Pagano also said he is concerned that investigating grand juries breed familiarity between prosecutors and the supervising judge because of their regular ex parte conduct without a defense attorney adversary present to provide corrective balance.

Jeff Lindy, a criminal defense attorney with Lindy & Tauber in Philadelphia who said he presented hundreds of cases to indicting grand juries in New York as a state prosecutor and also has defended clients before state and federal grand juries, said New York was like Pennsylvania, in which there are no clear-cut rules on how grand juries should proceed.

Preliminary hearings work as a check and balance in the criminal justice system because they hold prosecutors to at least a low burden of proof, Lindy said.

In New York, dozens of drug defendants would be indicted every hour, Lindy said, describing a scene in which a narcotics officer would sit on the stand before the grand jury reading his or her notes about the basic facts of an arrest, the prosecutor would walk out for a moment, and the grand jury would return a "true bill."

In contrast, the Department of Justice has national regulations that apply to every federal prosecution on how prosecutors conduct themselves and how to treat witnesses brought before a grand jury, Lindy said.

"You don't have the controls of a centralized prosecutorial agency like the Department of Justice and, if people think it's going to be a controlled and measured prosecutorial system, they are wrong. My experience with state prosecutors — this is true across the board — their approach to the grand jury is that, 'Oh goody, we can now investigate without worrying about the Constitution.'"

Continue reading

Previous

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Next



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Philadelphia Court
  • Manchester & Associates
  • Lindy & Tauber
  • O'Neill's
  • Department of Justice

Key categories

    
  • Executive Agencies

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out
    •      
  2. Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook
    •      
  3. Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive
    •      
  4. Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
    •      
  5. Leave-of-Absence Issues Managers Need to Know
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid to Collect 'Unconscionable' Fees

Martin Act Faces Big Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Hospital Accuses Judge Of Violating Judicial Canons
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media