• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Defense Counsel Raise Questions About Indicting Grand Juries

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Criminal Practice

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

Defense Counsel Raise Questions About Indicting Grand Juries

December 26, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

David Augenbraun, a Philadelphia assistant district attorney who has been supervising the office's investigating grand juries for a dozen years, said that indicting grand juries at the federal level are different because those indicting grand juries are taking place pre-arrest and that is why target letters are issued.

Indicting grand juries in Philadelphia are going to be typically used post-arrest and those criminal cases will be diverted from the normal preliminary hearing process into the indicting grand jury if there is evidence of witness intimidation, Augenbraun said.

Witnesses are permitted to bring counsel with them to an investigating grand jury and the attorney can be in the room with them, unlike federal grand juries or grand juries in other states, Augenbraun said. Defendants or their counsel would not be present for indicting grand juries, he said.

While state investigating grand juries are pre-arrest, target letters, for one thing, are not required under the rules and, for another thing, it is not yet clearly defined who is the target in those sorts of grand juries because the investigations are ongoing, Augenbraun said.

Witnesses receive an advice-of-rights form, including that they can consult an attorney, which is important because while an investigation is developing it's not always clear-cut that a person coming into the investigating grand jury does not have criminal exposure, Augenbraun said.

While some argue that prosecutors have too much power in grand juries, the grand juries are under the supervision of a judge, "so you have a neutral party who is supervising it and reviewing what's going on there. It's not like an out-of-control body," Augenbraun said.

Philadelphia criminal defense attorney Gregory J. Pagano said his concern with the expansion of grand juries in Pennsylvania is whether judicial supervision will be adequate to protect defendants and other witnesses.

Pagano formerly represented Eileen O'Neill, who is facing a 2013 trial on criminal charges including theft by deception, conspiracy and perjury. A co-defendant in her case faces criminal charges in the alleged murders of an abortion patient and of several infants who allegedly had been born alive.

Pagano was successful in a motion to have O'Neill's grand jury testimony suppressed.

According to court papers, O'Neill was sworn in as a witness before the investigating grand jury by former Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas Judge Renée Cardwell Hughes on August 20, 2010.

Continue reading

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Philadelphia Court
  • Manchester & Associates
  • Lindy & Tauber
  • O'Neill's
  • Department of Justice

Key categories

    
  • Executive Agencies

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  2. New District Judge Takes Firm Line on Attorney Conduct
    •      
  3. Workplace Bullying: Managing the Organizational Playground
    •      
  4. House Committee OKs Bills on Retirement Age, Traffic Court
    •      
  5. Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Three Strategies for Reducing Class Action Costs

Managing Relationships With Legal Project Management

News Corp. Hires Ex-Skadden Communications Chief Bush

Law Firm Leaders' Confidence Slipping, Says Survey

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Tech Circuit: LegalTech West Coast Edition

Silicon Startups

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw

Pro Bono Work Proposed as Condition for Bar Admission
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge in Stop-and-Frisk Case Relishes Her Independence

Ground Is Shifting in 14-Year Litigation

High Court Names Evers as the FJD's Court Administrator
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Rules Against Citgo in Case Over Oil Spill

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

DeKalb Judge Dismisses, Then Recuses

Jury Finds For Attorney In Legal-Mal Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media