Professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation against design professionals are significantly different. With the exception of having to prove conduct that deviated from the professional's standard of care, these tort theories require different proof and do not overlap. However, the line of demarcation between the two is becoming increasingly blurred. More and more, when plaintiffs are faced with the Pennsylvania Economic Loss Doctrine defense to a professional negligence claim because of a lack of contractual privity, they attempt to reclassify their claim to one of negligent misrepresentation without properly amending their allegations.
Professional Negligence vs. Negligent Misrepresentation
The Legal Intelligencer
August 7, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.