• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > The Freeh Report: A Case Study in How People Rationalize Ignoring Evil

Sponsored Ads

Font Size: increase font decrease font

From the Chief

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next

The Freeh Report: A Case Study in How People Rationalize Ignoring Evil

July 17, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

They had their moment of truth. They were confronted with an ugly situation: credible allegations of child abuse against one of their assistant coaches. They could turn him over to the cops or they could do nothing.

They choked. They did nothing. They had concerns, but they rationalized doing nothing.

So more kids got abused. Young, defenseless kids were sexually assaulted by a serial child rapist. All because they didn't go to the cops.

It makes no sense morally or logically. They were alerted to an allegation against Sandusky in 1998. According to the Freeh report, the police, the Centre County District Attorney's Office and the Department of Public Welfare all investigated Sandusky in 1998. Charges were never filed. You can ask why charges weren't filed, and you can ask why Paterno, Spanier, Curley and Schultz didn't do anything to remove Sandusky from campus then. But in fairness to them, the authorities investigated and they didn't charge Sandusky.

OK.

What's not OK is that they did nothing in 2001 when similar allegations were brought to their attention by former Penn State quarterback Mike McQueary, then a graduate assistant with the program.

The Freeh report makes plainly clear that it was inexcusable those four men failed to report Sandusky immediately to the police after McQueary told them what he saw in light of the fact that they had already been alerted something was wrong in 1998.

Why? It makes no sense. If they had reported Sandusky in 2001, they had cover. He was no longer a coach then, and if the 1998 incident came up, they could legitimately claim the authorities had looked into it and hadn't charged him. Beyond the obvious moral reasons, why wouldn't they have thrown Sandusky immediately under the bus in 2001 in order to protect themselves and the school?

Could it really be because they feared publicity and the impact on the football program? Seriously?

No institution, no matter how large or revered, is worth the price of one child.

Continue reading

Previous

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Next



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Pat Narcisi

    July 30, 2012 08:29 AM

    Good one.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Second Mile
  • Freeh
  • Legal Intelligencer
  • Centre County District Attorney
  • Department of Public Welfare
  • Catholic Church

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Pa. Justices Uphold Mandatory Judicial Retirement
    •      
  2. Senate Confirms Two Fed. Judges for Eastern District
    •      
  3. Sources: Justice McCaffery Contacted FJD About Cases
    •      
  4. Corbett to Nominate Stevens to High Court
    •      
  5. O'Connor Suggests End to Judicial Elections in Pa.
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fighting Over The Fifth
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Atlanta School Defendants Rely On New Jersey Officers' Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media