• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > D.C. Circuit Criticizes State Department in Dispute Over Iranian Group

Font Size: increase font decrease font

D.C. Circuit Criticizes State Department in Dispute Over Iranian Group

By Mike Scarcella All Articles 

The National Law Journal

June 6, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The U.S. State Department has four months to decide whether to continue to designate an Iranian dissident group as a foreign terrorist organization, a federal appeals court in Washington said Friday in an opinion that criticized the agency.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said it will remove the People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran from the list if the State Department fails to act in four months, posing a potential foreign relations headache for the government. The court's opinion is here.

Lawyers for the PMOI in February asked the appeals court to give a 30-day deadline to the State Department to act on the group's request for removal from the foreign terrorist list. In the alternative, the group's attorneys, who include Viet Dinh, said the appeals court could, on its own, take the group off the list.

The appeals court strongly criticized the State Department for failing to heed an earlier court order directing the agency to reassess the listing of the Iranian group. A U.S. Justice Department spokesperson was not immediately reached for comment. Lawyers for PMOI heralded the ruling.

"We are grateful for the relief granted by the Court, and we look forward to working cooperatively with the Department of State on the decision to delist," Dinh of Washington's Bancroft said in an email.

The PMOI, which claims it has renounced violence, has long sought removal from the foreign terrorist organization list. Inclusion on the list imposes financial restrictions on the group, whose supporters say they advocate for a secular, democratic Iran.

The D.C. Circuit in 2010 ordered the State Department to review the PMOI designation based on the court's finding that the agency violated the rights of the PMOI. The appeals court ordered the department to give the PMOI's lawyers a chance to review and rebut unclassified information the government used to justify the continued designation of the group on the terrorist list.

Nearly two years have passed since the appeals court told the government to reassess the PMOI listing. "Since our July 2010 remand, the Secretary's progress has been -- to say the least -- slow going," the appeals court said in a per curiam judgment. The panel comprised Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and David Tatel, and Senior Judge Stephen Williams.

"[B]ecause of the Secretary's inaction, PMOI is stuck in administrative limbo; it enjoys neither a favorable ruling on its petition nor the opportunity to challenge an unfavorable one," the D.C. Circuit said Friday.

The judges wrote that the State Department "has failed to heed our remand." They added that "the delay has the effect of nullifying our decision while at the same time preventing the PMOI from seeking judicial review."

"We have been given no sufficient reason why the Secretary, in the last 600 days, has not been able to make a decision which the Congress gave her only 180 days to make," the appeals court said. "If the Secretary wishes to maintain PMOI's FTO status, she can do so by simply denying PMOI's petition."

This article first appeared on The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Bancroft

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Mojahedin Organization of Iran
  • Legal Times
  • U.S. Justice Department
  • United States State Department
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out
    •      
  2. Judge Orders Parties to Hire Neutral Expert to Probe Facebook
    •      
  3. Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive
    •      
  4. Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
    •      
  5. Leave-of-Absence Issues Managers Need to Know
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media