An attorney for Wyeth told the Pennsylvania Superior Court on Tuesday that a $10 million verdict against the company in a hormone-replacement therapy case stemmed from a trial that was "permeated with irrelevant and inflammatory evidence."
May 03, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
An attorney for Wyeth told the Pennsylvania Superior Court on Tuesday that a $10 million verdict against the company in a hormone-replacement therapy case stemmed from a trial that was “permeated with irrelevant and inflammatory evidence.”
“No defendant could have won this trial,” Dechert’s Robert Heim told the three-judge panel.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
