Several mortgage lenders are seeking reargument in the state Superior Court after the court ruled in a trio of cases that their foreclosure notices were deficient.
March 14, 2012 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Several mortgage lenders are seeking reargument in the state Superior Court after the court ruled in a trio of cases that their foreclosure notices were deficient.
The three-judge panel of Senior Judge Robert E. Colville, Judge John L. Musmanno and Judge Christine Donohue said in all three cases that the mortgage lenders failed to comply with the notice requirements of Act 91, or the state Homeowner’s Emergency Mortgage Act.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
