• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > This Week's News > Letter: Chadwick Firm Engaged by FJD for Phila. Traffic Court Investigation

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Letter to the Editor

Letter: Chadwick Firm Engaged by FJD for Phila. Traffic Court Investigation

The Legal Intelligencer

December 13, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (2)
 

To The Legal:

Sam Stretton's letter, "Hiring of Firm for Phila. Traffic Court Investigation Raises Ethics Questions," published Wednesday in The Legal, complaining about the Chadwick review of the Traffic Court is wrong on the facts, wrong on the law, and misguided in every respect.

Contrary to Stretton's assertion:

• The Chadwick firm was engaged by the First Judicial District and not by the Supreme Court.

• The Chadwick firm was compensated by the FJD and not by the Supreme Court.

• I oversaw the Chadwick review and worked closely with the Chadwick team in my capacity as a common pleas judge of the FJD and administrative judge of the Traffic Court.

• The Chadwick firm was engaged to provide the following consulting services: (1) to assist the FJD in assessing the operations of the Traffic Court; (2) to facilitate the FJD's cooperation with the federal investigation; (3) to conduct an independent review of the integrity of the Traffic Court's operations, the quality of its internal controls and its compliance with applicable statutes and regulations; (4) to develop recommendations for ensuring the integrity of the processes for adjudicating non-parking traffic violations in the city of Philadelphia; and (5) to prepare a report of findings and recommendations.

For Stretton to suggest that this court lacks the authority to examine its own operations to ensure the fair and impartial administration of justice and compliance with applicable rules is nothing short of absurd. To the contrary, the FJD would have been remiss if it had ignored the red flags raised by the federal raids and waited for the federal government to act. One need only look to the Luzerne County Juvenile Court scandal for the consequences of ignoring red flags.

The public deserves our unstinting vigilance against corruption. When such vigilance requires that we engage an expert to examine our operations, we will do so without hesitation, and we will follow the trail wherever it leads, and to whomever it leads. It is our obligation as responsible public officials, and we make no apology for doing so.

Gary S. Glazer
Administrative Judge, Philadelphia Traffic Court



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Pilot

    December 14, 2012 12:44 PM

    Judge Glazer,
    I have information that specific lawyers and judges, on an ongoing basis, have engaged in violations of the Canons. Will you exam it with unstinting vigilance and do whatever else is necessary to protect the public against corruption as a result of your findings?
    Second request.

  • Pilot

    December 13, 2012 03:22 PM

    "The public deserves our unstinting vigilance against corruption." Gary S. Glazer
    Administrative Judge, Philadelphia Traffic Court

    That's good to know, Judge.

    I have information that specific lawyers and judges, on an ongoing basis, have engaged in violations of the Canons. Will you exam it with unstinting vigilance and do whatever else is necessary to protect the public against corruption as a result of your findings?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Chadwick
  • Traffic Court
  • Luzerne County Juvenile Court
  • Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. New District Judge Takes Firm Line on Attorney Conduct
    •      
  2. Workplace Bullying: Managing the Organizational Playground
    •      
  3. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  4. Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment
    •      
  5. Judges Want Master to Develop Record in Retirement Age Case
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court Officials Seek to Reform Process of Naming Acting Justices

NYC Defends Police Department's Use of Stop-and-Frisk

Immigrant Investor Program Gets Watchful Eye

Judge Orders Parties to Hire Expert to Probe Facebook

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lenders Win On Foreclosures
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Justices: Doc Interviews With Defense Are Attorney Work Product
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media