The legacy of two former Luzerne County Common Pleas Court judges who were sentenced to serve federal prison terms in the wake of a judicial scandal continues to work its way through the court system with a Superior Court decision last week in a case in which plaintiffs unsuccessfully argued that a property reverted to them because it was not used as a bank as required under the property deed.
Font Size:
![]()
Court Rules Against Return of Property to Luzerne Plaintiffs
The Legal Intelligencer
February 21, 2012
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.
