• Home
  • News
  • Firms & Lawyers
  • Courts
  • Judges
  • Surveys/lists
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Public Notices
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe

Home > Practice Columns > Lawyer Mobility Makes Separation Agreements a Necessity

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Law Firm Management

Lawyer Mobility Makes Separation Agreements a Necessity

By Arthur J. Ciampi All Articles 

The Legal Intelligencer

February 26, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
Arthur J. Ciampi

Arthur J. Ciampi

law firm management cover

Today, the topic of "lawyer mobility" is boring. Twenty-five years ago, when this author began representing lawyers and law firms, the concept of lawyer mobility was novel, if not revolutionary. The norm was for lawyers to begin and end their careers at the same firm, and law firms rarely asked partners to leave.

Today, the pendulum has swung to the other extreme. Lawyers routinely move firms to benefit their careers and provide better services to their clients. In addition, law firms, for good or bad, are run more like businesses (well, sort of) and partners who are perceived as unproductive or whose practices are deemed not to be compatible with their current firms are often asked to leave.

The bottom line is that lawyers change firms with regularity. Just like partners who are planning on sticking together should have a solid partnership agreement to govern them, partners who are moving on should have a solid separation agreement to govern their departures.

While there is no one-size-fits-all separation agreement, this article will discuss the topic of separation agreements and analyze and suggest some worthwhile provisions that should be included in an agreement.

Exit Compensation

Often the most contentious and important issue to negotiate in a separation agreement is exit compensation. The time of year, the circumstances surrounding the departure and the type of practice often determine the complexity of the agreement and the difficulty of the negotiation in this regard.

Partners who leave a firm voluntarily often do so after a bonus is paid. In those cases, they are determining their own departure date and are not leaving much behind.

Partners who leave prior to receiving their bonuses are often concerned that they will be deprived of a share of firm profits earned from their efforts in the year to date. Firms often take the position that such amounts are not owed to partners unless they have spent the full year as partners. A fair compromise, which is often reached, is to pay the departing partner a pro rata share of firm profits. This amount is often calculated by multiplying the partner's percentage share by the firm's annual profit and a fraction, the numerator of which is the last day of the year in which the partner was a partner and the denominator of which is 365. The resulting payment is then paid when the remaining partners receive their bonuses.

The above compromise, however, does not fairly compensate a departing partner or his or her firm in all circumstances. For example, a partner who departs a firm whose fees are based upon a contingency, such as plaintiffs personal injury or plaintiffs class action firms, are not fairly compensated by limiting their pay-out to a single year. This is the case because in such firms the partners have, in essence, financed the firm's contingency cases and upon their departure should be entitled, assuming the cases stay with the firm, to be paid a share of the fees when earned by the firm for the work they financed.

Conversely, if the partner leaves with cases, the firm's remaining partners should be paid from a share of the fees ultimately earned by their former partner. In such circumstances, the firm and departing partner often negotiate and include in a separation agreement a schedule of such cases that include a percentage allocation of attorney fees. The allocation is typically based upon the work done and anticipated to be done on the cases in question with the majority share going to the party who is required to do most of the remaining or more meaningful work.

Return of Capital

A related issue is the return of capital. A partner's capital account in a law firm is either the amount contributed by the partner as cash from initial or periodic capital contributions or is a partner's accumulation of yearly undistributed earnings. Taxes are paid on these contributions and accordingly the return of capital to a partner is tax-free and the loss of capital is therefore the loss of tax-free money, which should be avoided.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Ciampi LLC

Key categories

    
  • Law Firm Partners

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Workplace Bullying: Managing the Organizational Playground
    •      
  2. New District Judge Takes Firm Line on Attorney Conduct
    •      
  3. Bernstein Upholds $78.4 Mil. Verdict in Phila. Med Mal Case
    •      
  4. Third Circuit Rejects NLRB Recess Appointment
    •      
  5. Judges Want Master to Develop Record in Retirement Age Case
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Taking the Reins of Legal Department Operations

In-House Law: Now in 3-D!

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Rothstein Bankruptcy Trustee Files New Reorganization Plan
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Bar Wants Disbarment for Former Judge
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System

Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge Declines to Block Act-of-War Defense in 9/11 Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Panel Finds 'Excessive' City Fine for Poaching Antenna From Trash
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive

Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Water Warriors: Local Governments Bring Pollution Suits
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sanction Reversed; Filing of Sexually Explicit Chat OKd
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media