In an opinion of two factually similar cases, Akamai Technologies v. Limelight Networks and McKesson Technologies v. Epic Systems, consolidated as 692 F.3d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 2012), a split 6-5 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit significantly departed from prior precedent in holding that liability for induced infringement of a claimed method no longer requires all method steps to be performed by a single entity.
Departure From Single-Entity Rule in Induced Infringement of Method Claims
The Legal Intelligencer
December 4, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The Legal Intelligencer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.