A woman designated as a "principal driver" on her fiance's insurance policy was not a "named insured" under that policy, the state Superior Court has ruled, clearing the way for the woman to pursue a third-party tort claim unfettered by the policy's limited tort limitations.
Driver on Policy Not 'Named Insured,' Not Bound by Limited Tort
The Legal Intelligencer
February 12, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The Legal Intelligencer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.