In Commonwealth v. Cruttenden, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that a law enforcement officer, in possession of a suspect's cellphone, did not perform an "interception" under Pennsylvania's Wiretap Act when the officer, pretending to be the suspect, exchanged text messages with a co-defendant.
Font Size: 
Geekspeak
Supreme Court Holds 'Pre-Texting' Is Not an Interception
The Legal Intelligencer
January 15, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The Legal Intelligencer. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
