Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
Michael Hoenig, a member of Herzfeld & Rubin, writes: Do the admissibility rules cited by courts when they accept or reject test evidence make sense today, or do they represent mere relics from a bygone era? Has robust judicial "gatekeeping" of expert testimony for "reliability" under Frye or Daubert admissibility criteria effectively made evidentiary standards such as "sufficient similarity of conditions" or "substantially similar tests" outdated? A new, thoughtful, provocative, well-researched and clearly written article published far away should be required reading for those grappling with test evidence in important cases.
May 12, 2008 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
At NJM, a top-rated insurance company, we are seeking an Attorney on our Workers Compensation legal team with between 3 and 5 years of expe...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS