Lawyers for Comcast say the company's lack of interest in broader distribution for Tennis Channel Inc. stems from an objective cost-benefit analysis. The FCC determined differently, and now the sides are taking the dispute to a federal appeals court in Washington in a test of federal power to intrude on editorial discretion.
Lawsuit's second serve
The National Law Journal
February 25, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The National Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.