The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News

NLJ Home > Washington News > Court Watch News > Conflicting Senate testimony on gun-control options

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Conflicting Senate testimony on gun-control options

By Todd Ruger Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

February 12, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 
Harvard Law School's Laurence Tribe

Harvard Law School's Laurence Tribe

The U.S. Senate's consideration of new firearm regulations took a legal turn on February 12, with conflicting testimony about whether the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment rulings prohibit Congress from adopting measures to reduce gun violence.

"My answer to that is an emphatic 'no,' " said constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe, who has argued before the Supreme Court 35 times. Tribe, a Harvard Law School professor, told a Senate subcommittee that he reviewed of the District of Columbia v. Heller ruling from 2008 and McDonald v. Chicago from 2010.

"That pair of decisions demolishes the slippery-slope theory of those who oppose basically all firearms regulation on the view that once we permit any new firearms regulation at all, we will be inviting the government, step-by-step, to come ever closer to disarming the people," Tribe testified.

Tribe said the rulings took off the table options including an outright ban of all firearms, but left open regulatory tools like those now before the Senate. They include regulating the sale and transfer of guns; bans on high capacity magazines and weapons outfitted for them; bans on straw purchasers; universal background checks; or federal gun registration.

Sitting on the other end of the table was Charles Cooper of Cooper & Kirk in Washington, a longtime National Rifle Association litigator, who said that those two Supreme Court precedents protect weapons commonly used for lawful purposes including self-defense, including those bearing high-capacity magazines.

"The amendment is one of the few enumerated constitutional provisions that specifically protects the possession and use of a particular piece of property—arms," Cooper testified. "Standard magazines holding more than 10 rounds, and the firearms outfitted for them, are by any reasonable measure in quite common use in the United States."

The testimony gave a brief glimpse into the court arguments likely to follow passage of a bill at the center of the hearing, the Assault Weapons Ban of 2013 proposed by Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.). Her bill would ban certain semiautomatic weapons and large-capacity weapons, according to a Congressional summary of the bill.

Contact Todd Ruger at truger@alm.com.

 

 



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • ponsoldt

    February 13, 2013 02:38 PM

    this is not a close question. tribe clearly is correct, as anyone who has read the decisions understands.

    it's time to take ideology out of this discussion and for congress to do something meaningful to attempt to reduce gun violence, even if there is no single "perfect" solution. to do nothing would be a violation of oaths of office.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Cooper & Kirk

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Assault Weapons Ban
  • Supreme Court 35
  • National Rifle Association
  • U.S. Senate
  • Supreme Court of the United States

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
  2. NLJ 350 Regional Report: The Hot Markets, and the Cold
    •      
  3. Study Details Obstacles Confronting Minority Law Students
    •      
  4. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  5. Supreme Court Voids Human Gene Patents
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

 
  • About The National Law Journal   |
  • Contact The National Law Journal   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media