The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News

NLJ Home > Washington News > Court Watch News > Supreme Court Asked to Weigh in on NLRB Recess Appointments

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Supreme Court Asked to Weigh in on NLRB Recess Appointments

By Marcia Coyle Contact All Articles 

Legal Times

February 5, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (1)
 

The constitutional and political battle over President Barack Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board has reached the U.S. Supreme Court in a case involving striking workers at nursing care facilities in Connecticut.

HealthBridge Management, represented by former George W. Bush-era Solicitor General Paul Clement of Bancroft, on Monday filed an emergency application with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in which it seeks partial stay of a district court injunction ordering reinstatement of all striking workers pending its appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In the alternative, the application states, the justices could consider the application as a petition for certiorari and a partial stay of the injunction pending resolution of the petition.

"This is an extraordinary request prompted by extraordinary circumstances," wrote Clement in the application, noting that it is "undisputed" that as the strikes began, some union members engaged in "unconscionable acts of medical sabotage, such as switching medical charts and removing identification bracelets from Alzheimer patients."

Also counsel on the application filed by Clement is Rosemary Alito, sister of Justice Samuel Alito Jr. and co-chair of K&L Gates global labor and employment practice.

The district court issued the reinstatement order under the authority of section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, which authorizes the NLRB to seek preliminary injunctive relief to protect the Board's jurisdiction while the Board deliberates before taking final action.

"But the Board's ability to take final action has been called into question by the D.C. Circuit's recent decision invalidating the President's recess appointments and recognizing that the Board therefore lacks a quorum to take action," wrote Clement. "That decision is of particular consequence because any final action by the Board in disputes arising throughout the nation may be appealed to the D.C. Circuit. Moreover, the Board has made clear it will not acquiesce in the D.C. Circuit’s decision, and companies subject to final Board orders have made clear they will not comply because of the D.C. Circuit’s decision."

Under those circumstances, he added, the validity of the president's recess appointments will inevitably reach the Court whether in this case or the recent D.C. Circuit case of Noel Canning v. NLRB.

Clement argues that his case presents three questions: the validity of the recess appointments to the NLRB; whether the Board can seek relief under section 10(j) in the absence of a quorum by delegating authority to the Board's general counsel, and whether the traditional four-factor test for preliminary injunctive relief applies in the section 10(j) context.

"If this Court ultimately determines that the President's recess appointments are invalid, the question whether the Board may nonetheless seek section 10(j) relief will have the utmost importance, and so resolving that questioncontemporaneously with the recess appointment issue would be prudent," wrote Clement in HealthBridge Management v. Kreisberg.

HealthBridge manages sub-acute and long-term nursing care facilities for the elderly. Five of its centers operate in Connecticut. The New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199, represents units of employees at the centers. Approximately 700 members of the bargaining unit went on strike on July 2, 2012, after bargaining negotiations reached an impasse.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to Legal Times

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Avon

    February 04, 2013 10:24 PM

    Justice Ginsburg denied the stay early Monday evening, within hours after the request was filed.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Bancroft
  • K&L Gates

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Second Circuit
  • Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
  • National Labor Relations Board
  • New England Health Care Employees Union
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Corporate & Business Law
  • Executive Agencies
  • Federal Government & Politics
  • Labor and Employment Law
  • US Supreme Court

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Law for Laymen
    •      
  2. 'U.S. News' Top Law Schools Fall Short on Diversity
    •      
  3. Harvard Law Opens Applications to Juniors
    •      
  4. Suspension for Spurned Attorney Who Waged Vendetta
    •      
  5. The Calculus of University Presidents
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

The General Counsel and the Compensation Committee

Your Company's Been Hacked -- What Comes Next?

Simpson Helps Yahoo, Tumblr Connect for $1 Billion Deal

Kasowitz Benson Launches in Los Angeles

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Stanford Law Builds on Role as Legal Tech Incubator

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

South Florida Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Voids $3 Million Judgment Against 'Girls Gone Wild' Producer

Judge Says Boston Bombings Had No Effect on Terrorist Sentences
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Judge Declines to Block Act-of-War Defense in 9/11 Case
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Panel Finds 'Excessive' City Fine for Poaching Antenna From Trash
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Lawsuit Testing Federal Porn Regulation Allowed to Survive

Ex-College QB Can Press Claim Over EA's Video Game
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Brooks Looks To Political Ally For Criminal Defense

Attorney Fee Hearing in Waffle House Sex Case Heats Up
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

 
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media