A California woman claims that the Whole Foods and Wild Oats merger thwarts competition in the "premium, natural, and organic" products market and forces shoppers to pay higher prices at the checkout — all in clear violation of antitrust laws.
August 22, 2011 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
In the fall of 2008, a California woman, Ekaterini Kottaras, didn’t like what she was seeing on her grocery receipts from Whole Foods.
The natural foods giant had a reputation for being pricier than conventional grocery stores, but Kottaras believed she was paying more because Whole Foods Market Inc. had merged the year before with competitor Wild Oats.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate.
