NLJ Home > Court Decisions
Employees of privately held contractors or subcontractors of public companies are not eligible for whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit has ruled in a case of first impression.
Use these tools to search all U.S. Circuit and Supreme Court decisions from the past year.
A federal appellate panel ruled on Feb. 2 that a San Francisco judge abused his discretion by ordering the release of a video recording of the trial over California's Proposition 8, saying that he ignored a promise upon which supporters of the ban on gay marriage relied.
A Washington federal judge has denied class certification in an antitrust case against Whole Foods Market Inc., striking a blow to the 2008 lawsuit brought by an unhappy customer concerned about rising prices.
Seyfarth Shaw and partner Richard Alfred have won a malpractice case in Massachusetts brought against them by a former client, PCG Trading LLC, a supply chain management company.
A Canadian man named Ivan Nitschke, charged in an undercover online sex crime sting in Washington, turned down a plea deal that would have kept him behind bars for nearly four years.
A California judge on Thursday selected the first bellwether case against Toyota in consolidated state litigation over the automaker's sudden, unintended acceleration problems.
An advertising agency's copyright lawsuit against personal injury firm Parker Waichman can move forward to trial next month, but without a breach-of-contract claim.
In a pair of rulings, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit has affirmed nearly $2.9 million in awards to the families of three victims of murders committed by mobsters Whitey Bulger and Steve Flemmi while they were government informants.
A San Diego ordinance that banned political parties from contributing directly to local candidates violates the First Amendment, a federal judge has ruled.
Two insurance companies that covered companies in a patent and trademark infringement case should divide costs based on their time on the risk, not equally, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit has ruled.