The 4th Circuit last year upheld the dismissal of a challenge to a parody of the trademarks of a luxury goods marketer. Its Vuitton decision is the first appellate opinion to consider trademark parody since the 2006 enactment of the Trademark Dilution Revision Act. Although the court analyzed each of the statutory factors for blurring claims, it placed great weight on its finding that the defendant had produced a successful parody — the same finding that motivated dismissal of an infringement claim.
Protection for Parodies
The National Law Journal
February 11, 2008
This content is now available at LexisNexis®.
The ALM® and LexisNexis® Content Alliance
LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM’s legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM’s content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM’s other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.
ALM’s content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.
If you are not currently a LexisNexis subscriber, contact 1-800-227-4908 to find out more or click here to have a customer representative contact you directly.