The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News
  • Home
  • Legal Business
  • Law Schools
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Opinion
  • Video Center
  • Blog

NLJ Home > News > Circuit used wrong standard in DOMA ruling, brief argues

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Previous

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Next

Circuit used wrong standard in DOMA ruling, brief argues

March 1, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

But while Jones discredited the rationales offered for the distinction, Clement notes that Straub did not, instead finding a rational relationship between the definition of marriage in the act and the aims of Congress in enacting the law.

In defining marriage as exclusively between a man and a woman, Clement says, Congress is rationally pursuing the goals of providing a stable structure to raise unintended and unplanned offspring, encouraging the rearing of children by their biological parents and promoting childrearing by both a mother and a father.

He lauds Straub for saying that DOMA reflects "the understanding of marriage…throughout our nation's history" and that "if this understanding is to be changed…it is for the American people to do so."

Amicus Arguments

The procedural posture of the case is unique because, in the words of Clement, in February 2010, three months after Windsor filed suit in New York, "The Justice Department stops defending DOMA and starts attacking it."

BLAG voted 3-2 on party lines to step in and defend the statute.

The presence of the Obama administration on the side of Windsor and the entry of BLAG into the lawsuit prompted the Supreme Court to ask for opinions on two questions of jurisdiction from court-appointed amicus Vicki Jackson of Harvard Law School, who submitted a brief with Patricia Millett, Ruthanne Deutsch and Michael Small of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.

On the first issue, Jackson concluded that BLAG lacks Article III standing "to defend the constitutionality of laws that do not concern its own specific prerogatives."

The interest here "in assuring that the law is enforced is a generalized one," Jackson states. "It is the Executive Branch, not Congress, that is obligated to 'take care' that laws are enforced."

"Moreover, any injury that might arise from nondefense of a law would be to the whole Congress, which one House cannot assert alone," she states.

On the second question posed by the court, Jackson states the Obama administration's "agreement with the courts below (and with Windsor) deprives this Court of jurisdiction, because the United States suffers no injury sufficient to invoke Article III jurisdiction."

Ten amici have filed briefs backing BLAG in its defense of the law.

Continue reading

Previous

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Next



Subscribe to New York Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld
  • Bancroft
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • North Carolina Values Coalition
  • Amicus LLC
  • Second Circuit
  • BLAG
  • New York Court of Appeals
  • Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
  • Manhattan Declaration
  • Mauck & Baker
  • Westboro Baptist Church
  • Executive Branch
  • Legal Advisory Group
  • Straub's
  • Justice Department
  • American Civil Liberties Union
  • Brigham Young University
  • House of Representatives
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • Family Research Council
  • U.S. Court of Appeals

Key categories

    
  • Trusts and Estates

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Law for Laymen
    •      
  2. 'U.S. News' Top Law Schools Fall Short on Diversity
    •      
  3. Harvard Law Opens Applications to Juniors
    •      
  4. The Calculus of University Presidents
    •      
  5. Suspension for Spurned Attorney Who Waged Vendetta
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

The General Counsel and the Compensation Committee

Your Company's Been Hacked -- What Comes Next?

Amid Spy Scandal, Russia Boots Baker & McKenzie Lawyer

Survey: Firm Leaders Admit Downturn's Permanent Impact

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Cisco E-Book Delivers Ethics on the Go

Collaboration Is Key to Defending Cyberattacks

Prolific ADA Plaintiff Faces Nemesis in Harassment Suit

Ullyot Exit Closes Chapter for Facebook

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

$3M Judgment Voided Against 'Girls Gone Wild' Producer

Judge Says Boston Bombings Had No Effect on Terrorist Sentences
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Court System, Counties Agree on 3 Court Facility Upgrades

Guardian Who Delayed Final Account Must Pay Referee Fee
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Perelman's Case Against Arlin Adams Thrown Out

McVay Wins Superior Court Nod With Western Turnout
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Transocean, Halliburton, Anadarko Entities
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Insurer Beats Bid By Bilked Client
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Barnes Asks For Court-Appointed Lawyer To Help Defend Brooks

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

 
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media