The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News
  • Home
  • Legal Business
  • Law Schools
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Opinion
  • Video Center
  • Blog

NLJ Home > News > Feds preparing to sue Standard & Poor's over pre-crash ratings

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Feds preparing to sue Standard & Poor's over pre-crash ratings

By Amanda Bronstad Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

February 4, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

The U.S. Justice Department is preparing to file a civil suit against Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC for its positive reviews of collateralized debt obligations in advance of the financial collapse, the ratings firm announced on February 4.

The suit would be the first by the federal government against one of the ratings agencies since the crisis hit. According to Standard & Poor's, a subsidiary of McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., the Justice Department's civil division is looking at claims associated with its ratings in 2007 of collateralized debt obligations. The Securities and Exchange Commission has said that it was also considering taking legal action against Standard & Poor's.

"A DOJ lawsuit would be entirely without factual or legal merit," the firm said on its website. "It would disregard the central facts that S&P reviewed the same subprime mortgage data as the rest of the market—including U.S. Government officials who in 2007 publicly stated that problems in the subprime market appeared to be contained—and that every CDO that DOJ has cited to us also independently received the same rating from another rating agency.

"S&P deeply regrets that our CDO ratings failed to fully anticipate the rapidly deteriorating conditions in the U.S. mortgage market during that tumultuous time," the company continued. "However, we did take extensive rating actions in 2007—ahead of other ratings agencies—on the residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") which were included in these CDOs. As a result of these actions, more collateral or other protection was required to support AAA ratings on CDOs. With 20/20 hindsight, these strong actions proved insufficient—but they demonstrate that the DOJ would be wrong in contending that S&P ratings were motivated by commercial considerations and not issued in good faith."

Three firms are representing S&P: Cahill Gordon & Reindel, Morrison & Foerster and Keker & Van Nest, a spokesman for the ratings service said. Cahill litigation partner Floyd Abrams, who has represented S&P in litigation over its ratings, directed an email seeking comment to S&P.

The agency took particular aim at the department's possible use of the 1989 Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act statute, passed following the savings and loan scandal. Federal prosecutors have cited that statute in numerous lawsuits accusing federally insured banks including Wells Fargo & Co. and Bank of America Corp.'s Countrywide Financial unit of lying to the Federal Housing Administration about the quality of their mortgages. Standard & Poor's said that applying the statute against it would be "unprecedented" and without legal merit.

"In an attempt to end run well-established legal precedent, the DOJ plans to use a questionable legal strategy by suing S&P under the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act (FIRREA) – a statute enacted in 1989 to stabilize and reform the savings and loan industry," Standard & Poor's said. "If DOJ does bring suit, we will vigorously defend our Company against such meritless litigation."

The ratings agency underscored that the financial crisis was "unprecedented." Standard & Poor's ratings aligned with those by other ratings agencies at the time and it also issued several negative ratings, it said.

Since 2007, Standard & Poor's said, it has invested $400 million in strengthening its ratings. Additionally, with the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act and the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010, credit ratings agencies are now regulated by the federal government.

In 2011, a U.S. congressional report concluded that Moody's Corp. and Standard & Poor's contributed to the crisis when they were forced in 2007 to downgrade their inflated ratings on mortgage backed securities and collateralized debt obligations. The report, by senators Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), chairman and ranking Republican on the Senate permanent subcommittee on investigations, concluded that the ratings agencies ignored warnings about risky financial products.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Cahill Gordon & Reindel
  • Keker & Van Nest
  • Morrison & Foerster

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • AAA
  • S&P Company
  • Financial Services
  • 1989 Financial Institutions Reform
  • United States Securities & Exchange Commission
  • United States Department of Justice
  • Standard & Poor's Limited
  • Wells Fargo & Co.
  • Bank of America Corporation
  • McGraw-Hill Companies
  • U.S. Justice Department

Key categories

    
  • Executive Agencies
  • Banking and Finance

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
  2. NLJ 350 Regional Report: The Hot Markets, and the Cold
    •      
  3. Study Details Obstacles Confronting Minority Law Students
    •      
  4. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  5. Supreme Court Voids Human Gene Patents
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of Forms Draws N.J. High Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Ties to Senecas Cannot Shield Golf Course Developer, Panel Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Circuit Decision Costs Prevailing Attorneys $200,000 Fee Award
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corbett Signs Bill to Eliminate Traffic Court

Christian College Granted Injunction In Obamacare Suit
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

 
  • About The National Law Journal   |
  • Contact The National Law Journal   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media