The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News
  • Home
  • Legal Business
  • Law Schools
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Opinion
  • Video Center
  • Blog

NLJ Home > News > Lawsuit claims defamation by law review article

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Lawsuit claims defamation by law review article

By Karen Sloan Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

January 2, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (4)
 
Arizona State University Sandra Day O?Connor School of Law associate dean Zachary Kramer

Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor School of Law associate dean Zachary Kramer

Analyzing cases and discussing their broader implications is the foundation of legal scholarship, but a lawsuit claims that one professor's take on a pending employment discrimination case constituted defamation and invasion of privacy. 

New Jersey banker Robert Catalanello on December 28 sued Zachary Kramer, an associate dean at Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor School of Law and author of a 2011 law review article titled "Of Meat and Manhood." The article explores a separate lawsuit brought by a fired employee who alleged that Catalanello discriminated against him because of his vegetarianism and perceived homosexuality.

The suit also names as defendants the Washington University in St. Louis School of Law, which houses the journal that published the article, and Western New England University School of Law, where Kramer delivered a related lecture.

Catalanello is represented by Thomas Cafferty of Gibbons. Reached on January 2, he declined to comment without Catalanello's permission. Kramer could not be reached for comment.

Kramer's article focuses on developments in sex discrimination law, including the courts' treatment of gender stereotyping and how sex discrimination is manifested in different forms of bias. "In the case of the male vegetarian, what may look like vegetarian or sexual orientation discrimination is really sex discrimination in the form of gender stereotyping," the abstract argues.

The article cites former employee Ryan Pacifico's 2009 complaint against Catalanello, including a charge that he made numerous derogatory comments equating Pacifico's vegetarianism with homosexuality. "You don't even eat steak dude. At what point in time did you realize you were gay?" he said, according to Pacifico's complaint.

Catalanello's lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, cites numerous examples of Kramer's analysis of the Pacifico suit and claims they are false and defamatory.

"Catalanello harassed Pacifico not because Pacifico is vegetarian, but because Pacifico was not sufficiently masculine," reads one passage that Catalanello cited. "The key here is that vegetarianism acts as a proxy for effeminacy."

The complaint claims that Kramer's article has subjected Catalanello to "contempt, hatred and ridicule" and has injured his reputation, causing "serious and permanent injury."

Catalanello is a manager in the foreign exchange division of French investment bank Crédit Agricole. He also serves on the council of the Borough of Madison, N.J.

He is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney fees.

Contact Karen Sloan at ksloan@alm.com.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Roger Harvey

    January 04, 2013 10:10 AM

    Robert Catalanello would know all about being subjected to contempt, hatred and ridicule, given that he seems to have subjected Ryan Pacifico to precisely that. Homophobic, hypocritical bully would appear to sum him up nicely. I shall be closing my account with the Credit Agricole forthwith!

  • SHK

    January 03, 2013 04:11 PM

    Opinions to Go: The audience (readers of law reviews, almost entirley lawyers) would understand that the author is interpreting the complaint's allegations regarding the defendant's statements, not affirming the accuracy of the complaint nor purporting to know what was in the defendant's mind. Separate from a host of First Amendment and other policy issues, the statement can't be defamatory because it is not susceptible of the purported defamatory meaning.

  • Albert Davenport

    January 03, 2013 11:04 AM

    I thought Steinbeck wrote "Of Meat and Manhood".) http://www.valhallapress.com

  • OpinionstoGo

    January 03, 2013 04:58 AM

    It seems to me, as a non-lawyer, that there is a fine line between making a definite statement as fact, as in the lines quoted, and making a more nuanced statement, such as saying "It appears that Catalanello harassed Pacifico not because Pacifico is vegetarian, but because Pacifico was not sufficiently masculine . . . The key here is that vegetarianism appears to act as a proxy for effeminacy." Of course, such nuanced assertions may take a certain amount of power out of legal arguments.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Gibbons

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Borough
  • US District Court
  • Crédit Agricole S.A.
  • Sandra Day O'Connor School
  • Washington University in St. Louis School
  • New England University
  • Arizona State University

Key categories

    
  • Civil Rights and Constitutional Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Judge Strikes Law Banning Demonstrations at Supreme Court
    •      
  2. NLJ 350 Regional Report: The Hot Markets, and the Cold
    •      
  3. Study Details Obstacles Confronting Minority Law Students
    •      
  4. Largest State Poised to Require Practical Skills Training
    •      
  5. Supreme Court Voids Human Gene Patents
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

In-House Counsel Go to Privacy Boot Camp

In-House Changes at News Corp Ahead of Corporate Split

Proskauer, Former CFO Settle Bias Suit

Global Firms Cope With Istanbul Unrest

D.C. Circuit Nominations a Defining Moment

D.C. Circuit Nominees Widely Respected Within the Bar

Nine Tips to Avoid Starring in a Spreadsheet Horror Story

Snapshot: Tom Gelbmann

The Recorder 25: California Golden Again for Many Firms
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Capital Accounts: Judicial Branch's Brothers Don't See Eye to Eye
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Miami Photographer Sues Pop Star Justin Bieber
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Jeremy Alters Settles With Argentinian Firm For $1 Million
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Alcotest Should Be Discontinued Right Away, DWI Lawyers Say

Lawyer's Fudging of HUD Forms Draws Supreme Court Censure
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Restaurant in Union Square Park Ruled Permissible
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Magistrate Judge Finds Few Benefits to Class in Settlement
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Third Circuit Could See Rise in Pay-for-Delay Litigation

Cozen Debt Forgiveness Is Campaign Contribution, Court Says
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Sorry, Charlie, Your Wife Won't Support You

Top Reasons to Take Your Husband's Name

Interim Dean Named at Texas Wesleyan University School of Law
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Water Works: H2O Kept Lawyer-Lobbyists Busy
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Boosting Lawyers And Saving Lives
  •      
    • Subscription Required

11th Circuit Conflicted On Juveniles Stance
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Chimp Attack Victim Is Denied $150M State Lawsuit

Auto Body Case May Lead To CUTPA Reassessment

 
  • About The National Law Journal   |
  • Contact The National Law Journal   |
  • Advertise with Us   |
  • Sitemap
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy (updated 6/14/13) |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media