The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News
  • Home
  • Legal Business
  • Law Schools
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Opinion
  • Video Center
  • Blog

NLJ Home > News > Lawsuit claims defamation by law review article

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Lawsuit claims defamation by law review article

By Karen Sloan Contact All Articles 

The National Law Journal

January 2, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •       Comments (4)
 
Arizona State University Sandra Day O?Connor School of Law associate dean Zachary Kramer

Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor School of Law associate dean Zachary Kramer

Analyzing cases and discussing their broader implications is the foundation of legal scholarship, but a lawsuit claims that one professor's take on a pending employment discrimination case constituted defamation and invasion of privacy. 

New Jersey banker Robert Catalanello on December 28 sued Zachary Kramer, an associate dean at Arizona State University Sandra Day O'Connor School of Law and author of a 2011 law review article titled "Of Meat and Manhood." The article explores a separate lawsuit brought by a fired employee who alleged that Catalanello discriminated against him because of his vegetarianism and perceived homosexuality.

The suit also names as defendants the Washington University in St. Louis School of Law, which houses the journal that published the article, and Western New England University School of Law, where Kramer delivered a related lecture.

Catalanello is represented by Thomas Cafferty of Gibbons. Reached on January 2, he declined to comment without Catalanello's permission. Kramer could not be reached for comment.

Kramer's article focuses on developments in sex discrimination law, including the courts' treatment of gender stereotyping and how sex discrimination is manifested in different forms of bias. "In the case of the male vegetarian, what may look like vegetarian or sexual orientation discrimination is really sex discrimination in the form of gender stereotyping," the abstract argues.

The article cites former employee Ryan Pacifico's 2009 complaint against Catalanello, including a charge that he made numerous derogatory comments equating Pacifico's vegetarianism with homosexuality. "You don't even eat steak dude. At what point in time did you realize you were gay?" he said, according to Pacifico's complaint.

Catalanello's lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, cites numerous examples of Kramer's analysis of the Pacifico suit and claims they are false and defamatory.

"Catalanello harassed Pacifico not because Pacifico is vegetarian, but because Pacifico was not sufficiently masculine," reads one passage that Catalanello cited. "The key here is that vegetarianism acts as a proxy for effeminacy."

The complaint claims that Kramer's article has subjected Catalanello to "contempt, hatred and ridicule" and has injured his reputation, causing "serious and permanent injury."

Catalanello is a manager in the foreign exchange division of French investment bank Crédit Agricole. He also serves on the council of the Borough of Madison, N.J.

He is seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, as well as attorney fees.

Contact Karen Sloan at ksloan@alm.com.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

 

Reader Comments

  • Roger Harvey

    January 04, 2013 10:10 AM

    Robert Catalanello would know all about being subjected to contempt, hatred and ridicule, given that he seems to have subjected Ryan Pacifico to precisely that. Homophobic, hypocritical bully would appear to sum him up nicely. I shall be closing my account with the Credit Agricole forthwith!

  • SHK

    January 03, 2013 04:11 PM

    Opinions to Go: The audience (readers of law reviews, almost entirley lawyers) would understand that the author is interpreting the complaint's allegations regarding the defendant's statements, not affirming the accuracy of the complaint nor purporting to know what was in the defendant's mind. Separate from a host of First Amendment and other policy issues, the statement can't be defamatory because it is not susceptible of the purported defamatory meaning.

  • Albert Davenport

    January 03, 2013 11:04 AM

    I thought Steinbeck wrote "Of Meat and Manhood".) http://www.valhallapress.com

  • OpinionstoGo

    January 03, 2013 04:58 AM

    It seems to me, as a non-lawyer, that there is a fine line between making a definite statement as fact, as in the lines quoted, and making a more nuanced statement, such as saying "It appears that Catalanello harassed Pacifico not because Pacifico is vegetarian, but because Pacifico was not sufficiently masculine . . . The key here is that vegetarianism appears to act as a proxy for effeminacy." Of course, such nuanced assertions may take a certain amount of power out of legal arguments.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Post a Comment »
Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Gibbons

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Borough
  • US District Court
  • Crédit Agricole S.A.
  • Sandra Day O'Connor School
  • Washington University in St. Louis School
  • New England University
  • Arizona State University

Key categories

    
  • Civil Rights and Constitutional Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Law for Laymen
    •      
  2. The Calculus of University Presidents
    •      
  3. Law School Offers A Second Chance for Rejected Students
    •      
  4. IRS Official May Have Unwittingly Lost Right to Silence
    •      
  5. Suspension for Spurned Attorney Who Waged Vendetta
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

 
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media