The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News
  • Home
  • Legal Business
  • Law Schools
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Opinion
  • Video Center
  • Blog

NLJ Home > Opinion > Making Obamacare work

Font Size: increase font decrease font

OPINION

Making Obamacare work

The president must use executive authority to fill gaps on the role of multiemployer plans in the Affordable Care Act.

By George M. Kraw and Katherine McDonough All Articles 

The National Law Journal

December 10, 2012

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
President Barack Obama

President Barack Obama
Photo: Mike Theiler / POOL-CNP-PHOTOlink

The health care coverage of 26 million Americans is at risk if the federal government does not allow multiemployer health care plans to participate fully in the Obamacare exchanges and other key aspects of the Affordable Care Act. The exchanges operate as an insurance store for health care consumers, distribute tax credits and subsidies, and are a cornerstone of President Obama's health care reform legislation.

The incomplete Affordable Care Act does not address the participation of the multiemployer plans in health care reform. The answer to this and other gaps in the legislation is for the president to use his executive authority to fix them.

Multiemployer benefit plans are a product of the Taft-Hartley legislation enacted during the Truman administration and are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The plans are sponsored by unions and employers working through not-for-profit trust funds that are governed by an equal number of management and labor representatives. Plan assets can be spent only on benefits to plan participants or for costs of administration. The plans are especially important for industries with mobile work forces, such as construction, where a worker may have several employers in a single year. Many plans provide subsidized coverage for retired participants not yet eligible for Medicare.

The rush to complete the Affordable Care Act came after the election of Senator Scott Brown (R-Mass.) in early 2010 took away the Democrats' filibuster-proof majority. Before Brown was sworn in, the Senate had passed the Affordable Care Act, and that left final adoption of the statute to the then-Democratic controlled House of Representatives. After Brown was seated, the House could not return a revised bill to the Senate, where it would be subject to a filibuster. Instead it had to accept the flawed Senate bill as written, mistakes and all.

In a better world, the unintended consequences of the Affordable Care Act would be addressed by Congress and the executive branch working together after passions had cooled to fix the original legislation. The current realities of divided government make a legislative fix approved by both houses of Congress unlikely.

Under the Affordable Care Act, individual employers can buy health insurance for their employees through the health care exchanges. Low-income employees can receive subsidies for the insurance cost. Multiemployer plans have an ambiguous status under the Affordable Care Act. While they should be recognized as having the same status as employers, the law does not specifically do so.

Multiemployer advocates have presented arguments to various government agencies in favor of recognizing the plans' right to participate in the exchanges in the way employers can. If the agencies fail to do so before the 2014 implementation date for the exchanges, plans will find themselves unable to participate. The president should act now to ensure that multiemployer plans can participate in the exchanges.

Without access to the exchanges, multiemployer plans will be unable to provide coverage directly to participants and credits to employers. This in turn will encourage many employers and workers to abandon the multiemployer plans, and threaten the entire structure of multiemployer social protections. Multiemployer health plans often provide more than basic health care coverage, including dental, vision, life insurance and unemployment benefits. Related plans created by the same groups of employers and unions also often provide pension and other retirement and social protection programs. All of these programs would be put at risk by a collapse of the multiemployer health care plans.

At the beginning of the health care reform debate, Obama promised Ameri­cans that if they liked their current health care, they could keep it. How ironic that health care reform now has put multiemployer health plans at risk.

This is a problem with a solution that the Obama administration can fix through rulemaking and executive orders. And as similar issues arise from ambiguities and omissions in the Affordable Care Act, the president should not hesitate to use executive orders to clarify rules and ensure that health care reform can move forward.

George M. Kraw and Katherine McDonough are lawyers at the Kraw Law Group in Mountain View and Newport Beach, Calif. They represent multiemployer benefit plans.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Democrats
  • House of Representatives

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Law for Laymen
    •      
  2. The Calculus of University Presidents
    •      
  3. Law School Offers A Second Chance for Rejected Students
    •      
  4. IRS Official May Have Unwittingly Lost Right to Silence
    •      
  5. Suspension for Spurned Attorney Who Waged Vendetta
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

 
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media