As legal technology advances and data volumes expand, it’s difficult for lawyers and in-house counsel to manage electronic discovery efficiently and effectively. Even with predictive coding and other technology-assisted review (TAR) choices on the rise, only the earliest adopters are ready to abandon the ever-present and misunderstood keyword search in favor of more technologically advanced search methodologies.
As experienced attorneys know, it’s not that simple to change from one methodology to another. While TAR can heighten defensibility and lower costs compared with linear review, many litigators view it only as a budding trend.
