The National Law Journal with DC News from Legal Times

30 Day Free Trial

National News
Washington News
  • Home
  • Legal Business
  • Law Schools
  • Columns
  • Verdicts
  • Opinion
  • Video Center
  • Blog

NLJ Home > News > D.C. Federal Judge Weighs Dismissing FCPA Sting Case

Font Size: increase font decrease font

D.C. Federal Judge Weighs Dismissing FCPA Sting Case

By Mike Scarcella All Articles 

The National Law Journal

April 6, 2011

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 

Federal prosecutors in court Monday defended a two-year-long undercover foreign bribery sting by the government, saying the executives and employees charged in the investigation knew a foreign official was supposed to receive an illegal payment as part of a supply contract.

The foreign official in the sting was, it turns out, fake. And the deal to sell $15 million in arms and equipment was all a government-controlled ruse. Last year, the authorities charged 22 people for their alleged participation in a conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Defense lawyers in the case in Washington's federal trial court on Monday urged Judge Richard Leon to throw out the prosecution because of alleged outrageous government conduct.

Michael Rubinstein of Tampa, Fla.'s Cohen, Foster & Romine, who represents a businessman named John Wier III, argued Monday the government, through a cooperating defendant created a conspiracy among industry executives and employees who had little to no ties among each other.

"It should shock the conscience when the government just invents a crime," Rubinstein said.

The Justice Department's Joey Lipton, a fraud section prosecutor, said individuals charged in the sting never hesitated, never showed surprise. "There was no concern" about the deal, Lipton said. He said the executives and employees knew they were participating in a larger deal and were not alone in a "silo."

Leon said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit has set a high standard for dismissal based on outrageous government conduct -- including evidence of coercion and physical violence.

The judge seemed inclined to let jurors decide whether the government crossed a line in its sting. He noted that the defense lawyers in the case will have another shot at arguing the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction.

Assuming, that is, that any of the defendants go to trial. Several defendants have already pleaded guilty. Leon did not immediately rule Monday afternoon.

This article first appeared on The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times.



Subscribe to The National Law Journal

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Cohen, Foster & Romine
  • Justice Department
  • U.S. Court of Appeals
  • Legal Times
  • Cohen, Foster & Romine
  • Justice Department
  • U.S. Court of Appeals
  • Legal Times

Key categories

    
  • International Law
  • White Collar Crime
  • International Law
  • White Collar Crime

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Law for Laymen
    •      
  2. The Calculus of University Presidents
    •      
  3. Law School Offers A Second Chance for Rejected Students
    •      
  4. IRS Official May Have Unwittingly Lost Right to Silence
    •      
  5. Suspension for Spurned Attorney Who Waged Vendetta
    •      
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

 
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media