WASHINGTON — In the past five years, written or verbal communications that threaten, harass or make unsettling overtures to federal judges and others protected by the U.S. Marshalls Service (USMS) have increased by 89%, and threats via the Internet are also increasing.
Michael Prout, assistant director for judicial security within the USMS, recently provided the data to the U.S. Sentencing Commission which is looking into sentencing guidelines under the Court Security Improvement Act of 2007. The commission sought input on whether current guidelines are adequate as they apply to offenses under the act.
The USMS, according to Prout, is concerned with two criminal provisions of the 2007 act: 18 U.S.C. 115 and 18 U.S.C. 119, particularly with respect to violations that occur through the use of the Internet.
The first section, 18 U.S.C. 115, prohibits threatening a federal official to influence, impede or retaliate against a federal official who is performing official duties. This statute specifically mentions the federal judiciary. The 2007 act increased the statutory maximum penalty for this crime to 10 years, except that imprisonment for a threatened assault cannot exceed six years.
The second section, 18 U.S.C. 119, is a new law that makes it illegal to intentionally release personal restricted information, such as a home address or Social Security number, with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite the commission of a crime of violence to a covered person, such as a judge, assistant U.S. attorney, federal law enforcement officer or a member of their family. Violations of this section are punishable by imprisonment of up to five years.
The USMS has two categories of communications:
♦ Threats — defined as an inappropriate interest, circumstance or event that causes, or could potentially cause, damage to a target whether it is a person, location or specific event. A threat may be communicated in writing, verbally or through a third party.
♦ Inappropriate communications — any communication in writing, by telephone, verbally, through an informant, or by some suspicious activity that threatens, harasses, shows an unusual direction of interest, or makes unsettling overtures of an improper nature directed to a protectee.
Prout said a threat is always an inappropriate communication, but an inappropriate communication is not always a threat.
“For the purpose of this report, we defined ‘through the use of the Internet’ as writings or other information posted on an Internet website or blog,” he said. “We consider these threats to be more serious than written communications sent solely via e-mail. In terms of impact to the victim, and the potential to incite others, we do not consider a communication sent via e-mail to be much different than communication sent via regular mail.
“On the other hand, we view inappropriate communications and threats made via Internet postings and blogs very differently than other delivery method,” he added. “Unlike a letter or an e-mail, comments posted on an Internet Web site have the potential to be viewed by a countless number of persons. Internet postings that are hyper-critical and contain restricted personal information of the protectee, such as a home address or Social Security number, can create a large number of potential threateners virtually unknown to the USMS.”
Prout reported the following breakdown of inappropriate communications (ICs) by fiscal year:
| FY 2003 | 674 total ICs received (no further breakdown available) |
| FY 2004 | 873 total ICs received (no further breakdown available) |
| FY 2005 | 943 total ICs received (no further breakdown available) |
| FY 2006 |
1,111 total ICs received |
| FY 2007 |
Trending Stories
More From ALM
With this subscription you will receive unlimited access to high quality, online, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry. This is perfect for attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions or for attorneys that have fulfilled their CLE requirement but need to access resourceful information for their practice areas.
View Now
Our Team Account subscription service is for legal teams of four or more attorneys. Each attorney is granted unlimited access to high quality, on-demand premium content from well-respected faculty in the legal industry along with administrative access to easily manage CLE for the entire team.
View Now
Gain access to some of the most knowledgeable and experienced attorneys with our 2 bundle options! Our Compliance bundles are curated by CLE Counselors and include current legal topics and challenges within the industry. Our second option allows you to build your bundle and strategically select the content that pertains to your needs. Both options are priced the same.
View Now
Dynamically explore and compare data on law firms, companies, individual lawyers, and industry trends.
Law.com Compass includes access to our exclusive industry reports, combining the unmatched expertise of our analyst team with ALM’s deep bench of proprietary information to provide insights that can’t be found anywhere else.
Law.com Compass delivers you the full scope of information, from the rankings of the Am Law 200 and NLJ 500 to intricate details and comparisons of firms’ financials, staffing, clients, news and events.
July 11, 2024
New York, NY The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs. Learn More
April 18, 2024
New York, NY Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR! Learn More
April 25, 2024
Dubai Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession. Learn More Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal... Apply Now › Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien... Apply Now › Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ... Apply Now ›
04/15/2024
Connecticut Law Tribune MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS View Announcement › 
Breaking news and trends for law firm and legal departments about the evolving federal regulations in a volatile political climate. Federal Legal NewsSpecial CoverageSurveys & RankingsNational Law Journal |
