The appellant challenges the denial of its motion to dismiss claims of intentional interference with prospective business relationships, business disparagement, and product disparagement. The certificate of merit requirement is not limited to causes of action alleging negligence. The statute does not require the plaintiff to marshal all his evidence and does not foreclose the defendant from later challenging the sufficiency or admissibility of the plaintiff's evidence. The trial court's order is affirmed. Houston's 14th Court of Appeals, No. 14-12-00369-CV, 05-30-2013.
Dunham Engineering Inc. v. Sherwin Williams Co.
Tex. App. Dist. 14
June 6, 2013