New Jersey Law Journal Home

Featured Sponsors

FEATURED BOOK

Library of New Jersey Family Law Forms

New Jersey Bankruptcy Rules Annotated

lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

Practice Papers

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Oxford Health Plans, L.L.C. v. Sutter

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Where parties agreed that the arbitrator should decide whether their contract authorized class arbitration, his decision survives the limited judicial review allowed by Federal Arbitration Act § 10(a)(4).

SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT

Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.

Thursday, May 30, 2013

Because plaintiff produced sufficient evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether she consented to arbitration, the district court erred in denying appellants' motion to compel arbitration without first allowing limited discovery and then applying a summary judgment standard.

Selecting Non-Neutral Arbitrators in a Multiparty Dispute

Thursday, May 16, 2013

In some cases, parties elect a process in which they agree to the selection of two "non-neutral arbitrators" who together select a "neutral arbitrator." The notion of a non-neutral arbitrator is often deemed offensive, particularly in international arbitrations. An additional complication arises when the arbitration agreement calls for the appointment of non-neutral arbitrators in cases where there are multiple parties. This article explores that situation,

Can Sanctions Be Applied for Bad Faith in Court-Ordered Mediation?

Thursday, May 16, 2013

A court can require a party to appear at a mediation session, but the court cannot force a party to settle or even to make a settlement offer. And courts have not developed any clear standards for evaluating good faith in court-ordered mediation. However, do not conclude that the court will let a party get away with virtually anything in court-ordered mediation. Here are 10 "rules" that, when broken, have led to sanctions.

What Neuroscience Can Teach Us About Settlement Negotiations

Thursday, May 16, 2013

There is much that the latest developments in neuroscience can teach legal professionals about negotiations. This is particularly true when it comes to how people process information and make decisions. Mediators and lawyers alike can benefit particularly from what neuroscientists have revealed about priming and framing, two potent filtering mechanisms that can either inflame the emotional barriers to settlement or potentially defuse them.

The Reality of Virtual ADR

Thursday, May 16, 2013

The Internet is having a profound effect on the development of the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. It is used as a means for the resolution of conflict both directly, through the Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy process, and indirectly, by offering traditional ADR process opportunities to remote parties. This article explores the pros and cons of these developments.