Case Digests
Opinions Approved for Publication
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Federal and state court opinions approved for publication.
SPONSOR SPOTLIGHT
Bolz v. Bolz et al
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Where an automobile collision involves both public and private tortfeasors, apportionment of each driver's negligence or fault must be assessed, even if there is a possibility that the public entity may not be liable for damages because plaintiff did not meet the Tort Claims Act injury threshold.
McGrath v. Poppleton, etc.
Thursday, May 8, 2008
Where the alleged oral modification of the written contract to buy real estate was unenforceable, and the sale did not take place, the sellers are entitled to the non-refundable deposit pursuant to their original sales agreement.
In the Matter of the Expungement Petition of Ross
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Robert Ross appeals from the denial of his petition for expungement of his bribery conviction.
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
Attorneys' fees awarded pursuant to the EAJA after a successful appeal of the denial of Social Security benefits are payable directly to the attorneys.
State v. Cottle
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
An attorney who is contemporaneously under indictment in the same county as his client, and being prosecuted by the same prosecutor's office, is engaged in a per se conflict of interest, absent a valid waiver by the client.
State v. Schadewald
Monday, May 5, 2008
Where the court was unable to determine from the record whether defendant was entitled to a step-down in sentencing based on a prior uncounseled plea, the case was remanded.
State v. Shabazz
Monday, May 5, 2008
Where expert testimony and industry publications indicate that the scientific reliability of event data recorder evidence is generally accepted within the automotive and accident reconstruction community, the evidence met the Frye standards for admissibility.
Milford Mill 128, L.L.C. v. Borough of Milford et al
Monday, May 5, 2008
A redevelopment plan can require an applicant to obtain a consistency finding from the governing body as a precondition to having its development application considered by the planning board or board of adjustment.
More Case Digests
Fisher v. Division of Law
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Crawford et al. v. Marion County Election Board et al.
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Township of Marlboro v. Scannapieco et al
Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Opinions Approved for Publication
Friday, April 25, 2008
Unpublished Opinions
Friday, April 25, 2008
The Estate of Spencer v. Gavin et al
Thursday, April 24, 2008
In re Application of Virtua-West Jersey Hospital Voorhees for a Certificate of Need
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Gutierrez et al v. Johnson & Johnson
Thursday, April 24, 2008
State v. Lisa
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Board of Education of the Lenape Reg'l High School Dist. v. N.J. Department of Educ., Office of Special Education Programs
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Bender v. Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc.
Thursday, April 24, 2008
Virginia v. Moore
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
EMC Mortgage Corporation v. Chaudhri et al
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
State v. Reid
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
State v. Krause
Thursday, April 17, 2008



