The New Jersey Supreme Court hears arguments in a case that tests whether a defendant, convicted after a fresh juror was substituted for an allegedly sick one on a stymied panel, was denied a fair trial.
January 07, 2014 at 02:31 AM
1 minute read
A judge in a criminal trial can’t replace a juror to break a deadlock during deliberations, but what if a juror who may be the holdout claims to be ill?
The New Jersey Supreme Court heard arguments Monday in a case that tests whether a defendant, convicted after a fresh juror was substituted for an allegedly sick one on a stymied panel, was denied a fair trial.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Evergreen Trading is a media investment firm headquartered in NYC. We help brands achieve their goals by leveraging their unwanted assets to...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
