New Jersey Law Journal Home
  • Home
  • Advertise
  • Find a Job
  • Books
  • CLE
  • Daily Decision Service
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Smart Litigator

Home › Gaining Experience and Helping Others at the Same Time

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Gaining Experience and Helping Others at the Same Time

By Matthew S. Olesh All Articles 

The Legal Intelligencer

March 5, 2013

  •    
  •    
  •    
  •      
 
olesh

Matthew S. Olesh

Most young attorneys understand and appreciate the value of doing pro bono legal work. For many, in a world where billable hours reign supreme, the issue is almost always one of diverting time away from fee-based matters and devoting the necessary amount of time to properly represent those in need.

However, when making this calculation, many young attorneys fail to recognize the positive effects doing pro bono work can have on their own careers. If there is any question in your mind as to whether you should commit to a pro bono representation, the immediate tangible benefits you will almost certainly see to your own career growth and development should tip the scales firmly in favor of doing so.

When I started practicing law as a litigation associate in one of Philadelphia's largest firms, I was eager to dive right in and get started. With scenes from My Cousin Vinny and other law-themed movies fresh in my mind, I could picture myself taking the Philadelphia courts by storm right out of the gate.

Of course, I know now, and deep down I probably knew then, that getting into court as a first-year associate is not always easy, especially in some of the larger firms. While firms are typically mindful of exposing young associates to actual courtroom experiences from an early stage in their careers, such experience usually comes in the form of observing a more senior attorney and/or mentor argue. The opportunities to actually stand before a judge or arbitrator and argue can be few and far between.

Luckily, I had an ace up my sleeve in the form of pro bono work. While at law school, I had been involved in a clinic that advised indigent clients on custody and support issues, and knew that I wanted to continue to help such clients as I built my practice. I quickly got in touch with Philadelphia VIP (with whom I highly recommend volunteering), found a case that looked interesting and off I went. Within a matter of weeks, I was arguing before a judge in family court.

Other pro bono opportunities came my way, and I always jumped at the opportunity to not just get involved, but to get valuable experience along the way. In addition to trying to always have at least one active pro bono child custody case, I have negotiated a settlement for an injured woman who entered into a structured settlement, represented a local neighborhood association in a dispute with various members of its community and represented prisoners in civil rights actions as part of the Prisoner Civil Rights Panel of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Each of these matters provided me with valuable, yet distinct, opportunities to refine my legal skills from an early point in my career. Whether it was getting into court from an early stage, taking and defending depositions or dealing directly with and advising clients, I feel fortunate to have had such great pro bono opportunities from the outset of my career. Young lawyers should make it a point to seek out similar pro bono opportunities early and often.

There is no mandatory pro bono requirement for attorneys imposed by the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct. However, Rule 6.1 is clear that a "lawyer should render public interest legal service." Although this appears to fall short of required pro bono service for Pennsylvania lawyers, the rule continues to discuss ways by which a "lawyer may discharge this responsibility." Thus, although the language of the rule is permissive, it is clear that pro bono service is not just something nice that lawyers can do, but indeed is a responsibility for all those who choose to practice law and be barred in Pennsylvania.

For young lawyers, the choice should be a no-brainer. Why not take advantage of your obligation to help not just those in need, but to help yourself by furthering your own career? It is truly a situation where everybody wins.

Of course, my purpose is not to suggest that attorneys should place their own career interests ahead of those of their pro bono clients or prospective clients. Indeed, the comments to Rule 6.1 state that "personal involvement in the problems of the disadvantaged can be one of the most rewarding experiences in the life of a lawyer." This is certainly the case. The overriding principle behind pro bono is the opportunity and, to be sure, the moral, ethical and professional obligation to provide legal assistance to those who truly need it but are unable to afford it.

A browser or device that allows javascript is required to view this content.

Continue reading

  • 1
  • 2

Next



Subscribe to The Legal Intelligencer

You must be signed in to comment on an article

Find similar content

Firms mentioned

    
  • Fox Rothschild

Companies, agencies mentioned

    
  • Pennsylvania Rules
  • Prisoner Civil Rights Panel
  • US District Court

Key categories

    
  • Pro Bono
  • International Law

Most viewed stories

    
  1. Circuit Voids $3 Million Judgment Against Girls Gone Wild Producer
    •      
  2. Bar Candidate Quits N.Y. Job To Satisfy N.J. Practice Bylaw
    •      
  3. Appellate Division To Roll Out Electronic Case Filing System
    •      
  4. Court Limits Liability for Injury Or Death of One Invited To Help
    •         
      • Subscription Required
  5. No Crime-Fraud Exception to Marital Privilege, Court Finds
    •         
      • Subscription Required
lawjobs.com

TOP JOBS

MORE JOBS

POST A JOB

From the Law.com Network

Hiring Interns? Be Sure to Do It Right

ACC Weighs in on Arizona's In-House Pro Bono Rules

Ex-Dewey Partners Face New Foe in Firm's Bankruptcy

S&C Adds Linklaters Restructuring Partner in London
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Contrite Companies Can Win Forgiveness in Bribery Cases
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Plaintiffs Want to See Toyota's 'Crown Jewels'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Enron Sandbox Stirs Up Private Data, Again

LegalTech West Coast Wraps Up With Ethics, VC News

In Tricky Prosecutions, Judges Play Peacemakers

Ropers Majeski Tries to Re-Invent Itself
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Fla. Attorneys Lead Force-Placed Insurance Fight

Lawsuit Names Missing Fla. Attorney for Alleged Fraud
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Summer Programs Still in a Drought

Lawyer Not Covered for Alleged Malpractice at Prior Firm
  •      
    • Subscription Required

The Affordable State-Specific Practice Solution
Available in NY, NJ, PA and CT editions - research, draft and prepare even the most complex cases with ease.

Firm Takes Another Hit in Bid for 'Unconscionable' Fees

New York's Martin Act Faces Test in Challenge to 2005 Case

Castille Testifies in Favor of 'Civil Gideon' Funding

Workers' Comp Judges Can't Fight Rescinded Raise
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Law Schools Are Looking Beyond LSATs, Says Mich. Dean

Is Freezing Your Eggs the Solution?

Advising Clients on Weather and the Workplace
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Texas Sues BP, Others Over Deepwater Oil Spill Disaster
  •      
    • Subscription Required

'Follow That Escapee!'

Judge Who Tossed Defense Counsel Accused of 'Partiality'
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Corporate Bribery Case Part Of National Trend
  •      
    • Subscription Required

Court Continues To Grant Lawyers Fraud Immunity
  •      
    • Subscription Required

About njlj.com   |   Contact njlj.com   |   Advertise with Us   |   Site Map
  • About |
  • ALM Properties |
  • ALM Reprints |
  • Customer Support |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • Terms & Conditions |
  • ALM User License Agreement
ALM Media