Claim of "objectively reasonable likelihood" that communications with foreign contacts will be intercepted at some point under the FISA Amendments Act is insufficient to establish standing to sue, as that theory is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's "threatened injury" requirement.
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Clapper v. Amnesty International USA
New Jersey Law Journal
February 26, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to The New Jersey Law Journal. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.